AN UPRIGHT MAN
By Stanley Rice 2014
An upright man—there is my story. Every image we
have of Edd Hicks is stern and upright, as if by his very glance he
could bring order to the world. In almost every image he is slightly
frowning, not in sadness or anger, but with a sense of control of his
life. In some images, such as the one on the homepage, he is just
slightly smiling. Since he was born in 1879 in Indian Territory, not
far from Oologah in what is now northeastern Oklahoma, you might think
that the reason for his stern expression was that he had to sit
motionless for a daguerrotype. But most of the images are from the
post-Instamatic age. No, it was because Edd was a serious man, as right
as right can be. He was much more serious than the boy who was born
across the creek on Dog Iron Ranch the same year, the boy who kept
getting into trouble, a boy Edd used to hang around on the streets of
Oologah with, a boy named Will Rogers.
In this story, we will try to find out why Edd was
so serious.
Edd Hicks was a member of the Cherokee Nation in
Indian Territory. The Cherokee tribe had experienced two tumultuous
centuries (see Nancy Ward: Cherokee Ancestor of Edd Hicks and The Trail
of Tears: How Edd’s Family Came to Indian Territory). By the end of the
nineteenth century, the Cherokee Nation in Indian Territory had overcome
most of its chaos. It had flourishing cities, farms, and schools. But
more chaos was on the way. The United States now wanted to annex Indian
Territory as part of the new state of Oklahoma.
In addition to what was going on in the Cherokee
Nation, there was plenty of chaos in Edd’s immediate ancestry.
A Chaotic Family
In 1907, the same year as Oklahoma statehood, Edd
was engaged to Mary Carter. In his engagement portrait with her, he has
a satisfiedly serious look, confident that he was about to establish a
family. As he and Mary rode into town in a carriage to get married,
they were stopped by Mary’s brothers, armed and on horseback. They
demanded that she return home with them. Edd may or may not have known
that this might happen, but either way, he was prepared. He told Mary
that her decision, right then and there, would be final. There would be
no negotiation or hesitation. No attempts to patch up differences. Edd
did not apparently say, “Now, boys, can’t we all just get along here?”
Mary went home with her brothers. Edd must have been crushed, but he
never doubted that he had made the right decision. His setback was
temporary. Two years later, he married a woman, Estella Leona Huston,
whom he had met in the store in Chelsea where he was the butcher, a
store he had started with his brothers about 1890.
But this raises more questions—what was it about Edd Hicks that made a
rural Oklahoma farm family consider him objectionable as an in-law? As
far as any of his descendants know, there was nothing personally
objectionable about him personally. Near as we can figure, it must have
had something to do with the family from which he came. And this might
bring us to another reason for his uprightness: his reaction against
his family. Here are some possibilities.
Edd’s great-grandmother.
Edd’s great-grandmother was Elizabeth Hilderbrand (born 1801), a
great-granddaughter of Nancy Ward. She married James Pettit and they had
a farm in the Cherokee Nation prior to the Trail of Tears. Their three
children were Andrew (born 1828), Minerva (born 1830), and William (born
1832 or 1833). Elizabeth Hilderbrand Pettit and her three children were
on the Trail of Tears, but James Pettit was not with them. Here is why.
Some white men took Cherokee wives and raised
Cherokee families, but also had white wives and white families. This may
have been what happened with Nancy and Bryant Ward. Bryant and Nancy
had a daughter, but Bryant also had a white family in South Carolina. By
the early nineteenth century the Cherokee Council considered this to be
bigamy. So when Elizabeth Pettit found out in 1829 that her husband
James had a white family in Missouri, she brought suit against him. The
Council found in her favor, and she kept the kids, the farm, and
everything else. Not that it made much difference; within a few years,
she was on the Trail of Tears, with only what she could carry. Elizabeth
Pettit was the first and only woman to sue her husband for bigamy in
the Cherokee Nation prior to the Trail of Tears.
When she got to Indian Territory, Elizabeth Pettit
remarried, first to Daniel Ward, then to Robert Armstrong. Elizabeth
Armstrong died in 1877 and is buried in the Ft. Gibson Cherokee Citizens
Cemetery, alongside her son William.
Edd’s grandmother.
About 1850, Lewis Hicks married a Cherokee woman, Minerva Pettit. They
had three children: Finnie, born about 1850, about whom nothing more is
known; Andrew Jackson Hicks, born in 1852; Rachel Ada Hicks, who later
married James Merrell, born in 1854. But Edd was married to Minerva
only briefly. She had six husbands. She married John Anderson about
1848, then married Lewis Hicks about 1850. She married Israel J. Ward
on August 18, 1856; but they had a child, William Whitfield Ward, who
was born on May 27, 1856. If these dates are correct, the conclusion is
obvious: she had an affair with Ward, perhaps while she was still
married to Lewis Hicks. She married John Journey about 1860, and they
had a child named Frank. She married Jesse Russell about 1865, and he
died soon afterward (possibly in the war). Finally, she married Alfred
Clark Raymond on January 29, 1868. They had at least one child (Mary
Amelia). Minerva died about two years later, barely forty years old.
Raymond lived until 1913. It might be safe to conclude that Edd had a
wild grandmother.
Therefore, for several generations up to and
including his grandfather’s, Edd’s family had a history of marital
chaos. It seems reasonable that Edd wanted nothing to do with the other
branches of his family from those earlier days. Regarding the
Hilderbrand family, Edd’s daughter Nina recalled him saying, “They’re no
kin of mine,” which, said Nina, probably meant that they were.
Edd’s father.
Not much is known about Edd’s father, Andrew Jackson Hicks, except that
he was a chaser of dreams. His marriage was not chaotic; he married
Mary Adelide Franklin, and was married to her for the rest of his life.
Andrew died, when Edd was 26, of pneumonia that he got while searching
for lost Indian gold. According to family legend, Andrew kept some gold
hidden in a creek bank, and when, after his death, somebody came
looking for it, the ghost of Andrew Hicks came riding on his white
horse. Was Edd determined to never be a chaser of dreams and source of
embarrassing legends like his father?
There was also confusion about Edd’s Cherokee blood
quantum (and therefore, that of all his descendants). Was U-s-quv-ne a
fullblood Cherokee? Many citizens of the Cherokee Nation, back in the
east, were partly white. Chief John Ross was himself only one-eighth
Cherokee. Minerva Pettit was part Cherokee. Bryan Ward, and probably
Joseph L. Martin, were white, making Nancy Martin one-quarter blood
quantum. But Michael Hildebrand might have been part Cherokee. And
Edd’s mother, Mary Franklin, looked very much like a Cherokee in one of
her early photographs. She lived in Tennessee, where some Cherokees had
managed to stay after the Trail of Tears. Edd signed the Dawes Roll of
Cherokee citizens, and listed his blood quantum as one-sixteenth. This
siblings listed other, and larger, blood quantum figures. They cannot
all be right. The siblings all had the same blood quantum, but listed
different amounts.
Edd made sure his children knew about their Cherokee
ancestry. My Mom (Nina) told me that on hot days he would sit in the
doorway, where the breeze was greatest, and sing Cherokee songs. The
youngest kids (Nina, Jack, Bill) thought they sounded so strange and
laughed at him. Edd tried to teach Cherokee language to the youngest
kids, but they thought it was ridiculous, and he gave up. Edd had a
Cherokee name, Tsi-s-qua, but this is the word for “little creature,”
so it must have been a childhood nickname, rather than a serious name,
that his father (or grandfather) had given him. The only Cherokee
language the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of Edd Hicks know is
from books and websites.
Edd’s sister.
Andrew and Mary had the following children, with their Dawes Commission
enrollment numbers (for more information, see the Partial Family Tree):
Edd (13,250); Serena (13,540); Frank (12,928); Lon (12,927); and Amelia
(12,929). Andrew’s enrollment number was 12,926. Two other children,
Annie and Alvie, died in 1896, before the enrollment began (for their
story, see the Partial Family Tree). It appears that Serena (whose name
is spelled in lots of ways, such as Surrener) was not as wild as
Minerva but did not have marital stability. She was married several
times.
Edd’s brother.
Edd also undoubtedly reacted against his brother. The photo we have of
Lon Hicks shows an old man who had a slight grin that hid a secret. He
was the trickster who could talk you into giving him everything you had
and then slipping away in the night. Family accounts differ as to what
he did. One account says that he ran the store where Edd was the
butcher, and that, one day, he was gone—to Las Vegas, with the store’s
till. Another account says that he talked Edd into selling his Cherokee
allotment land for a dollar an acre, far less than its value, then sold
the land without telling how much he got for it.
Either way, it was clear that Lon was the one who
wanted other people to do the work, while Edd had decided that he would
do everything himself. Everywhere he lived, as he moved frequently, Edd
grew his own food and milked his own cows. In at least one case, at
Salina (on land now flooded by Lake Oolagah), he built the house
himself. Until he was old, none of his houses had electricity. He and
Stella raised chickens, and fed a large family on eggs and milk and
vegetables and meat, all from their own farm. Since there was no
refrigeration, whatever they could not eat on any day was loaded onto
the wagon and pulled to the general store by the mules, Kate and Beck,
to be traded for the few food items, such as flour and salt, that Edd
did not raise himself. They always sold the cream. This was how Edd had
determined to live, while Lon was in Las Vegas. And it was clear which
way of living was more successful. Edd’s family always had food during
the Great Depression, even though the little money Edd had in the bank
was lost overnight. Lon died indigent, in a county nursing home in Los
Angeles, and was buried in a common grave.
And this tells us exactly what Edd was like. He
lived his entire life, every moment of it, creating a space of peaceful
order. Build a house and a barn, plow a farm, raise food, send the kids
to school. Edd insisted on a life that was as right-angled as the
corners of the houses he built. Frequently, circumstances beyond his
control made this impossible. I do not remember all of those
circumstances. In one instance it was because they lived near a
relative who turned out to be very demanding. (This was probably at the
Slocter place. One of Serena Heape’s daughters, Clara, married a man
named Slocter.) The last straw was when the woman (Clara Slocter?)
objected to Edd cutting away some wild grape vines. When something
happened that would make his idealistic life impossible, Edd would move
the whole family to a new place. It appears that he never for a moment
considered staying and trying to patch up a compromise or to tolerate a
dilution of his principles. He moved from one Promised Land to another
every five to ten years.
A Hard and Upright Life
Edd’s life involved a lot of hard work. The kids
also spent many hours of work to keep the family fed. The only way to
have food in the winter was to can it, lots of it. While it may have
been easy enough to boil and can tomatoes, they had to snap the beans
and remove the fibers along the edge before canning them. Raising the
food was a lot of work too. The kids would spend hours picking Colorado
potato beetles off of the tomato and potato plants and putting them in
tin cans, where they would be killed by hot water Stella brought from
the kitchen. They had no washing machines. Clothes dried on the
clothesline but had to be ironed (there was no permanent press in those
days) with irons heated on a wood stove, a task that took the two girls
Clara and Nina many hours each week. Do the math. Eight kids.
Edd was also religiously upright. When the famous
preacher Billy Sunday came through, he had dinner at Edd’s house and
talked with him a few hours. We will never know what they discussed,
but we can be sure that they figured out that the world around them,
near and far, was a black-and-white patchwork of good and evil, with no
indecisive grayness in between. Edd was also, more than once, the head
of the school board. Once, in a one-room schoolhouse (as all of them
were in rural Oklahoma), a young female teacher had kept a particularly
handsome male student in the classroom while making all the other
students play outside. Once again, we do not know what happened, but
Edd talked to the teacher, who soon vanished.
It almost seemed as if the world that surrounded Edd
obeyed him. Crops grew. Cows gave milk. And his children lived, most of
them. His firstborn, Clifford, died after a few months, perhaps of a
birth defect. His second-born, a son named Herb, lived well into
adulthood, but was killed in a gas field explosion. His ninth child,
Floyd, a gentle blond boy, died at age five of a bacterial disease. But
the others lived. Almost miraculously, all of his sons fought in World
War Two and not only survived but were never harmed. Maybe God listened
to Billy Sunday and to Edd.
Edd and Stella did not have much of what we consider
to be essential today. I do not refer only to electricity, but to
things such as health insurance. When their daughter Nina (my Mom) got
poison ivy all over her face, and lethal infection was a real
possibility, Edd went into town and bought ointment (the kind that
would now be considered toxic) and applied it to her face with a
chicken feather. Edd and Stella’s success at making a good life in no
way shows such things as health insurance to be unnecessary. If they
could have afforded health insurance, it is nearly certain that
Clifford and Floyd would have survived. If there had been workplace
safety rules, the explosion that killed Herbert might not have happened.
The End of Edd’s Life
Edd was accustomed to having his body obey his will,
and it did right up to the end of his life. But he was cantankerous
when he was older. Some of the grandchildren who knew him considered it
a game to get away from him, as he was always ready to administer
corporal punishment. It was not merely their misbehavior, real or
imagined, that got him riled up. It was also his irritation at seeing
his own body disintegrate.
Edd had a stroke in 1959. As the stroke was
beginning, he was getting dressed to go to the hospital. He fainted
while getting dressed, and Stella had to help him and clean him up. It
can safely be said that he hated being helpless.
And, as you might expect from a larger-than-life
person, there is some Edd Hicks mythology that has survived. According
to two of his children (Clara and Bill) who witnessed his death, what
appeared to be a ball of fire moved under his hospital bed and out the
window at his last breath. Though some consider this a miracle, the
possibility that it was just automobile headlights from outside
reflecting on a mirror cannot be discounted. Stella, who was resting at
home, did not see it.
Stella outlived Edd by two decades. When she was
very old, she lived alone in a small house on Cherokee Street in
Claremore, a house that was later torn down, in a block that is now
being made into a commercial property. Her Social Security was a mere
pittance, since Edd’s work did not involve payroll taxes or payrolls at
all. She received welfare money. One day about 1968, when most of her
children were together in her living room, they were talking about how
terrible the people were who were on welfare. Stella piped up,
emotionally, that welfare had been a blessing to her. All her children
instantly said that she deserved it, because she had worked hard all of
her life. They had been condemning those who used welfare as an excuse
to not work.
The next generation
The generation of Edd and Stella’s children grew up
with some of the same virtues. But Edd was so staunchly right that, in
some ways, his children reacted against his heavy burden of virtue.
It was evident in many small ways. Edd would never
have allowed what he considered an unclean word to pass his lips. His
children, when growing up, or when in his presence as adults, also
spoke cleanly. But get “The Boys” together by themselves, and the
language just ripped. Laughter was as abundant in them as it was
restrained in Edd’s character. I am trying to imagine how Edd would
ever have done what his son Dick did, entertaining the next generation
by making a squeaking noise with his dentures.
It was also evident in larger ways. To Edd, his
family was sacrosanct. Divorce was unthinkable. It probably never
occurred to Edd or Stella. We know of no reason they might have been
dissatisfied with each other. But the fact that they needed each other
for economic survival must have helped. In the next generation, there
were three divorces which, out of seven adult children, was slightly
below the national average. The oldest surviving son, Roy, married a
woman, Lola Mae, who was already pregnant by another man. The child,
who went by the name Roy Hicks, lived in Oologah. But Roy and Lola Mae
divorced and Roy married Maxine. (Native American blood quantum here
gets even more complex, since both Roy and Maxine were descended along
separate lines from Minerva Petit, whose last husband was Lewis Hicks.)
A middle son, Dick, married Betty and had four sons. Eventually he
divorced Betty and married Barbara. The youngest son, Bill, married
Lillian, and had two children before eventually divorcing her and
marrying Lucille. I, for one, was raised to think that these couples
just had irreconcilable differences; I was never encouraged to dislike
the former spouses of my three uncles, though I only met one of them.
What stories this next generation had, both at home
and in the War. This essay, about Edd, cannot include their stories,
which will be placed separately on this website.
The Legacy of Edd and
Stella
It is clear that the lives of Edd and Stella
continue to live in their grandchildren, in both good and bad ways
(mostly good). As for how their legacy continues in their
great-grandchildren, they will have to write the chapter themselves.
The most obvious way is in virtue. Though Edd and
Stella’s children and grandchildren have had many imperfections, it is
clear that they are above the national average in leading lives of
goodness. No criminals, no abusers, and all (to my knowledge)
passionately hard workers. By a combination of good luck and hard work,
none are dependent on public assistance. Most believe that hard work
will keep you from financial disaster, but they also know that
(especially during a recession) luck has also been a reason that we are
not a welfare family.
Edd and Stella’s grandchildren, like their children,
have also been frugal. Now this is a term that is not popular in
America today. Being frugal is nearly the equivalent of being
unpatriotic. In order to help corporations lift the economy out of
recession, we are supposed to be, as much as possible, consumers. That
is, buy things even if you don’t have the money, then throw them away
and buy new things. Edd and Stella lived frugally, before and during
and after the Great Depression, and not just because they did not have
very much spare money. They believed that you could enjoy life just as
much with few possessions as with many, and they were right. It made
things a bit austere, maybe even grim—as far as I know, they never had
a Victrola or a radio. Clothes and quilts were home-made (by Stella),
although each child got a new pair of shoes whenever they needed them.
Just one, as I understand. Their grandchildren are much more wasteful,
but less so than the average American. In at least one case (me), the
decision was made that the nearly six hundred dollars a year for cable
TV was better spent elsewhere. Edd and Stella never took on debt.
Edd and Stella’s family did spend their resources on
some pleasures, but only for important events, such as Christmas. In
rural Oklahoma during the early twentieth century, you could not just
go and buy a Christmas tree. The Christmas tree was a cedar bush,
probably cut by Edd himself. There were a few presents. But, as my
mother recalled, the main event was to come downstairs on Christmas
morning and find that each child’s plate had an orange on it. At the
time, oranges were rare in rural Oklahoma stores.
One bad legacy is a lingering dislike of races other
than white and Native American. It is not a general white racism, since
the whole family is only too aware of its mixed ancestry—and proud of
it. Hatred of black people, however, was very openly articulated by the
generation of Edd and Stella’s children. They must have gotten it from
Edd and Stella. None of them, however, would have participated in
violence against blacks. (Somehow my Mom ended up inheriting a gavel
that was used at KKK meetings, but it came from outside the family.)
Then sometime in the early 1980s, Edd and Stella’s children just
stopped using the N word very much, and stopped saying much about black
people. Did they have a change of heart, or did they just see that
racism was a vestige of the past? The grandchildren still have little
tatters of racism, but this attitude is clearly dying away.
But if that is the worst thing you can say about the
legacy of Edd and Stella Hicks, it still leaves them as a major force
for good in the world in their time. If you can divide the people of
the world into the Builders and the Destroyers, it is clear that Edd
and Stella were passionate Builders, a state of mind that has continued
in, as far as I am aware, all of their descendants. In those cases
where other people or families, who have come into contact with ours
through marriage, have acted in a destructive fashion (and there are
lots of stories about this), everyone in our family has marveled that
such destructiveness was even thinkable. We descendants of Edd and
Stella can hardly even imagine the destructive attitude that so many
other people have. And that tells you what kind of people we are.
Epilogue
So much of our history has been lost. We are not one
of those families in which journals were kept. The generation of Edd
and Stella’s grandchildren are not pleased at how few of the
photographs in the albums had names and dates on them. Fortunately,
many people in the photos were unmistakable, because of Edd’s stern
satisfaction, Lon’s avuncular but mischievous smile, the sharp faces of
Roy and Dick, Bill’s impish grin, and so on. Of course we figured out
who Kate and Beck were, since they were the only two mules in the
photos. Edd and Stella’s children did not like to talk a lot to their
children about their lives. My Mom mentioned that, one day about 1998,
most of the siblings had gotten together for lunch at her apartment in
Claremore. “The boys” started sharing World War Two stories which, Mom
said, they seldom talked about. I wish I had been there and heard them.
But no one now alive was there. We have to make the best use that we
can of the little fragments we have, like little pieces of skeleton of
a great ancient beast that happened to be preserved in a fossil layer.
And that is what we are trying to do on this website, so that all of
their descendants can share and read the stories that they remember,
and that the world can get a glimpse of life in rural Oklahoma in the
last century.
I invite all descendants of Edd and Stella to send
or tell their stories to me, and, with their permission (and my the
editorial work as a professional writer), I will post them on this
website in upcoming months and years.